College presidents from about 100 of the nation's best-known
universities, including Duke, Dartmouth and Ohio State, are calling on
lawmakers to consider lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, saying current laws actually encourage dangerous binge drinking on campus.
The
movement called the Amethyst Initiative began quietly recruiting
presidents more than a year ago to provoke national debate about the
drinking age.
"This is a law that is routinely evaded," said John McCardell, former president of Middlebury College
in Vermont who started the organization. "It is a law that the people
at whom it is directed believe is unjust and unfair and discriminatory."
Other prominent schools in the group include Syracuse, Tufts, Colgate, Kenyon and Morehouse.
But
even before the presidents begin the public phase of their efforts,
which may include publishing newspaper ads in the coming weeks, they
are already facing sharp criticism.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving says lowering the drinking age would lead to more fatal car crashes.
It accuses the presidents of misrepresenting science and looking for an
easy way out of an inconvenient problem. MADD officials are even urging
parents to think carefully about the safety of colleges whose
presidents have signed on.
"It's very
clear the 21-year-old drinking age will not be enforced at those
campuses," said Laura Dean-Mooney, national president of MADD.
Both sides agree alcohol abuse by college students is a huge problem.
Research
has found more than 40 percent of college students reported at least
one symptom of alcohol abuse or dependance. One study has estimated
more than 500,000 full-time students at four-year colleges suffer
injuries each year related in some way to drinking, and about 1,700 die
in such accidents.
A recent Associated Press analysis of federal records found that 157 college-age people, 18 to 23, drank themselves to death from 1999 through 2005.
Moana Jagasia, a Duke University sophomore from Singapore, where the drinking age is lower, said reducing the age in the U.S. could be helpful.
"There
isn't that much difference in maturity between 21 and 18," she said.
"If the age is younger, you're getting exposed to it at a younger age,
and you don't freak out when you get to campus."
McCardell's group takes its name from ancient Greece,
where the purple gemstone amethyst was widely believed to ward off
drunkenness if used in drinking vessels and jewelry. He said college
students will drink no matter what, but do so more dangerously when
it's illegal.
The statement the
presidents have signed avoids calling explicitly for a younger drinking
age. Rather, it seeks "an informed and dispassionate debate" over the
issue and the federal highway law that made 21 the de facto national
drinking age by denying money to any state that bucks the trend.
But
the statement makes clear the signers think the current law isn't
working, citing a "culture of dangerous, clandestine binge-drinking,"
and noting that while adults under 21 can vote and enlist in the
military, they "are told they are not mature enough to have a beer."
Furthermore, "by choosing to use fake IDs, students make ethical compromises that erode respect for the law."
"I'm
not sure where the dialogue will lead, but it's an important topic to
American families and it deserves a straightforward dialogue," said
William Troutt, president of Rhodes College in Memphis, Tenn., who has signed the statement.
But some other college administrators sharply disagree that lowering the drinking age would help. University of Miami President Donna Shalala, who served as secretary of health and human services under President Clinton, declined to sign.
"I
remember college campuses when we had 18-year-old drinking ages, and I
honestly believe we've made some progress," Shalala said in a telephone
interview. "To just shift it back down to the high schools makes no
sense at all."
McCardell claims that his experiences as a president and a
parent, as well as a historian studying Prohibition, have persuaded him
the drinking age isn't working.
But critics say McCardell has badly misrepresented the research
by suggesting that the decision to raise the drinking age from 18 to 21
may not have saved lives.
In fact, MADD CEO Chuck Hurley said, nearly all peer-reviewed
studies looking at the change showed raising the drinking age reduced
drunk-driving deaths. A survey of research from the U.S. and other
countries by the Centers for Disease Control and others reached the
same conclusion.
McCardell cites the work of Alexander Wagenaar, a University of Florida epidemiologist and expert on how changes in the drinking age affect safety. But Wagenaar himself sides with MADD in the debate.
The college presidents "see a problem of drinking on college
campuses, and they don't want to deal with it," Wagenaar said in a
telephone interview. "It's really unfortunate, but the science is very
clear."
Another scholar who has extensively researched college binge-drinking also criticized the presidents' initiative.
"I understand why colleges are doing it, because it splits their
students, and they like to treat them all alike rather than having to
card some of them. It's a nuisance to them," said Henry Wechsler of the Harvard School of Public Health.
But, "I wish these college presidents sat around and tried to work out
ways to deal with the problem on their campus rather than try to
eliminate the problem by defining it out of existence," he said.
Duke faced accusations of ignoring the heavy drinking that
formed the backdrop of 2006 rape allegations against three lacrosse
players. The rape allegations proved to be a hoax, but the
alcohol-fueled party was never disputed.
Duke senior Wey Ruepten said university officials should accept
the reality that students are going to drink and give them the
responsibility that comes with alcohol.
"If you treat students like children, they're going to act like children," he said.
Duke President Richard Brodhead declined an interview request.
But he wrote in a statement on the Amethyst Initiative's Web site that
the 21-year-old drinking age "pushes drinking into hiding, heightening
its risks." It also prevents school officials "from addressing drinking
with students as an issue of responsible choice."
Hurley, of MADD, has a different take on the presidents.
"They're waving the white flag," he said.
___
Associated Press Writer Barbara Rodriguez contributed to this report from Durham, N.C.